China’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 came after lengthy negotiations. In other words, many parties are concerned that China’s international trade actions, and how they replicate the interplay between its government and its domestic economic system, could belie Beijing’s insistence that the country has outgrown its non-market economic system status.
This is mainly as a result of the two components used for purposes of comparison — the exporting country’s residence” prices, and its costs of production — are both too skewed in a non-market economic system as a result of heavy governmental involvement.
As part of China’s promise to move toward totally changing into a market economic system, that commonplace required China to reveal that market economic system situations prevailed in the trade producing the product underneath investigation,” and, if it couldn’t, the importing country may evaluate prices or costs primarily based on an economic system of similar economic growth to China — somewhat than Chinese prices and costs.
Ii) The importing WTO Member could use a technique that’s not primarily based on a strict comparison with domestic prices or costs in China if the producers underneath investigation can not clearly show that market economic system situations prevail in the trade producing the like product with regard to manufacture, production and sale of that product.
Here is the kicker: China’s argument for reaching computerized market economic system status hinges on one specific sentence in Section 15, which states that in any event,” the second provision above shall expire 15 years after the date of accession” — that is, on December 11, 2016.